The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) is vested with the power to enforce and administer all laws relative to the conduct of elections and to insure free, orderly, and honest elections. Does its power include the authority to annul an election which may not have been free, orderly, and honest?
The Supreme Court, in holding that it does not include such authority, and that Article X, Section 2 of the 1935 Constitution [Guevara vs. Commission on Elections, 55 O.G. 1013] is merely preventive, said:
"It is intended to prevent any and all forms of election fraud or violation of the Election Law, but if it fails to accomplish that purpose, it is not the Commission on Elections that is charged with the duty to cure or remedy the resulting evil, but some other agencies of the Government. The power to decide decisions involving the right to vote is expressly withheld from the Commission on Elections although, the right to vote is provided in the Election Law, the enforcement and administration of which is placed in the exclusive charge of the Commission. Parallel to the withholding of such power from the Commission is the vesting in other agencies of the more inclusive power to decide all contests relating to the elections, returns and qualifications of the Members of Congress namely, the Electoral Tribunal of the Senate in the case of the senators, and the Electoral Tribunal of the House of Representatives in the case of the members of the latter. Election contests involving provincial and municipal officials are entrusted to the courts." [Nationalista Party vs. Commission on Elections, 85 Phil. 149]
No comments:
Post a Comment